Photo Of An Antediluvian Giant

Despite of the fact that they never offer any trustworthy and convincing evidence to validate their own case, Darwinian evolutionists –as well as any other enemy of the Faith– are always demanding from Christians scientific evidences that would corroborate the claims of the Bible concerning everything it says in general, and the giants of Genesis chapter 6 in particular.

Well, evidences abound, and this is one. I should say that there could be many more at hand, but when they have been found by fundamentalist Darwinians, they have been ignored, hidden or simply destroyed. Destroyed by those who later on demand such evidence. An example of this is the "mysterious" disappearance of more than 50 perfectly kept gigantic antediluvian skeletons (between 10-14 feet tall) found in a cave in Arizona.

You may, or not, have heard that Mr. Samuel Hubbard, dicovered remains of giants in a cave in the magnificent Grand Canyon of Arizona. His discovery was very important:

• He found 2 petrified human bodies about 15-18 feet tall respectively. One of these was buried under a recent rock fall which required several days' work to remove; the other, which Mr. Hubbard photographed, was in a difficult to access crevice. Both bodies were formed of a limestone petrification embedded in sandstone.
• He also found an ancient beach, now sandstone, that contained a great number of footprints of an entire race of giants: men, women and children. The prints of the adults were between 17 and 20 inches long and corresponded in size and shape to the Carson City and Blue Ridge prints. With these prints are also associated those of a huge elephant, somewhat similar in size to the remains discovered in the La Brea pits –the Elephas Primigenius– as well as tracks of a very small horse, which probably corresponded to the "Pliohippus." This beach where all this was found was evidently occupied when the river was many hundreds of feet above its actual level. Some of the human prints wee partly covered by the overlying stratum of stone, which is gradually weathering off.
• Lastly, he found wall drawings that showed dinosaurs, elephants, ostriches, and ibexes; as well as the same figure of the serpent with the egg in its mouth as it has been found in the Mississippi mounds, with numerous other drawings. One of the drawings showed an elephant attacking a man. If the drawing is to scale, and if the elephant corresponds to the La Brea animal, then the man must have been about 18 feet tall.

Even Darwinians have fond specimens so enormous that they have called : "Gigantanthropus" or "Gigantopithecus" (Scientists love those high-sounding names to impress you, and make you think that they know much more than they really do)

The following is an interesting quote from Dr. Franz Weidenreich of the American Museum of Natural History and who computed the size of "Meganthropus." and found out that it was about 800 pounds and, if proportioned like modern man, then he would had been 9 feet tall. About the same height as that famous nephilim called Goliath a contemporay of another nephilim, Og the king of Bashan.

Dr. Weidenreich said:

... But the gist of the whole story, which arouses our foremost interest, is the fact that "Gigantopithecus" is not a giant ape, as von Koenigswald assumed, but a giant man and should, therefore, be called "Gigantanthropus." This follows beyond any doubt from the very characteristic pattern of the occlusal surface of the teeth, which differs fundamentally in the structure of the cusps from that of any known anthropoids but agrees even in the minutest details with the hominid pattern as shown by the molars of "Pithecanthropus," Sinanthropus" (other kinds of nephilim) and even modern man. On the other hand, the form of the teeth, especially that of the third lower molar, and the condition of its root indicate that it has preserved a very primitive character, much more primitive than the known third molars of any fossil hominid. Therefore, we have the same combination which struck us in the human fossils of Java; namely, primitiveness together with gigantic proportions. But in the case of "Gigantopithecus" the gigantism reaches a new climax. The volume of the crown of the third lower molar is about six times larger than the average crown of modern man; compared with the corresponding tooth of the gorilla, it is about twice as large.

We should remember that there have been found human tracks 21.5 inches long in Texas and even a phenomenal 24 inches long in Australia. On the other hand, let's not forget that every ancient culture on earth has recollections of giants that became part of their mythologies.

So, were there real giants on the earth? You bet! Why I know so? Because God says so in His Bible. Period. But, of course, that period is enough for me and those who have experienced the veracity of the only Holy Book on the planet in our own lives. (No, I'm not politically correct. I hate hypocrisy) For the rest, who have not had such personal experience or those of weak Faith I give you this photo of a 47-inches human femur of a 14-16 feet tall giant, which says it all. If you are honest, then you will continue your own investigation on the matter, like I did. May the Lord allow you to see His Truth and where it is hidden the lie. It is only the Truth that sets us Free indeed.

Now, remember as they say in the Omniological Society: "The hard part is not finding the truth. The hard part is accepting it, especially when it means that your presently held views are proven wrong."