|
|
Nothing is worst than being right about what you hate. For years I have been screaming in doubtful ears that there is high treason nested in the most elevated posts in the government of Israel; that not all Jews love the Jewish people (neither Israel as a nation, much less as a holy nation); that some of these traitorous self-hating Jews are willfully cooperating with anti-Semitic NWO-elitist elements who bribe and use them as puppets on behalf of their evil agenda of total world control. Just look these days at that mediocre semblance of Jewish-American journalist, Mike Wallace, slobberingly enamored with the neo-Nazi Sultan of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and you will have an idea of what I mean.
To me it is not surprising that anti-Semitism is growing in the world — in my article 'Facts About Israel' I give some of the reasons for it, although certainly not all. What to me is really amazing is to observe the incapacity that so many Jewish people demonstrate to realize that thousands of years of trying to appease any anti-Semitic forces stocking them has only brought sometimes delayed but sure attacks — in most cases it caused an even stronger disdain and persecution. The bullying anti-Semitic enemy gets not only emboldened with a morose Jewish response, but he feels validated in his perception concerning any Jewish lack of worth and determination. And as if that was not enough, in front of a perceived Jewish weakness, he feels his hateful emotions wholly validated. After all, for all bullies, weaklings only deserve harassment.
Bullies and Memories
Like anyone else, when I was a child I had to deal with bullies in school. I was a skinny, shy, gentle and easy-going kid; and these traits would, from time to time, send a wrong message to some bully or another. Now, being the case that bullies always outweighed me, invariably when they would come to mess with me I would momentarily play friendly with them; and a few minutes later, when they started to enjoy their victory, I would suddenly kick them as hard as I could where it would hurt them the most and I would relentlessly delivered to them as many hard blows as I could to their eyes, stomach and neck. And so I would continue kicking, punching, putting dirt in their eyes, and yes biting them, anything, until they would fly away — at which moment I would throw at them as many rocks or pieces of wood as I could lay my hands on them. In those moments I new that I could not stop, no matter how hard they would punch me back. I knew that I could not cry, even though I would much feel like it. I knew that I could not show fear, even though I might have been more afraid than they were. I knew that I had to kick, punch, bite, or whatever else, as hard and as often as I could. After all, by looking at the experience of others I knew that failure to do so would make my life in school more miserable than already was — oh boy, did I hate school! The intersting thing is that bullies like Bartolo and "Pollino," became my friends after their respective weapings. They respected me. I suspect that they might have thought that I was a little crazy for fighting like that. I was not famous as a fighter, since I never picked up fights, but everybody knew that it was better not to mess with me; so they let me alone, and I was as happy as possible in school.
My best friend in those times was Paneque, a wonderful kid if ever there was one, noble and loyal ... but with a very strong speech impediment that somehow convinced the bullies that he had to be an idiot worthy to he harassed. When he was with me — which was most of the time — he was in the safe zone; but when he was alone, he would attrack bullies like honey does to the bears. He never fought, but he always got punched. He never kick anyone, but he was pushed around. I saw him dealing with bullies a couple of times, before I would intervine, and the most I saw him doing was punching very, very slightly a bully that was ordering him to do so. Of course, the bully responded to his gentle contact by punching him really hard. Later on he would tell me that he had punched the lad do soft in order not to get him mad. Thus he was trying to prevent a hard punch back. What his fear never allowed him to understand was that whenever he would do so, he was inviting the very hard punch he was so "diplomatically" trying to prevent.
Now don't get me wrong, I do believe that if somebody gets mad at us and strikes our face we should offer the other cheek — most of all if they are those with whom we have a deep relationship. But bullies are a different matter. These are predators who, feeling totally depleted of any sense of worth, hate those whom they dim to be better than them; so, they only live to fight them while dellutionally trying to prove to themselves that they are worth something just by hurting those whom he sees as having what he wants: parental love, nice toys, intelligence ... whatever.
Lessons To Be Remembered
Out of those encounters I learned a few valuable lessons much worthy to be remembered. One of them was that bullies are at war ... constantly ... with everyone. For a normal kid like me, a fight was just that, a fight. But for bullies it was war, a never ending war, a war against everyone. (Later on I learned that it was because they were at war with themselves, and most of all with their families of origin. But that is another issue.) While growing in my small town I realized that some bully children could become in time good citizens, once they grew up; but I also saw that most did not. They stopped fighting others physically because it was a very dangerous affair to indulge in as an adult. But they would continue down the path of life with all kinds of disfuctional lifestyles. So they continue making their life, and the life of those around them, a very difficult one indeed.
So, yes, in some cases it is true that children with a bully attitudes and behavior change. Now, it is a much more difficult thing when it comes to adult bullies. But when it comes to nation bullies, it is simply impossible ... well, impossible unless a major military defeat is inflicted to them. That is what history most clearly evidences.
History, Force And Diplomacy
Make no mistake, despite of what all the New World Order parrots constantly repeat, diplomacy has never changed the collective aggressive attitude of any bully nation on this planet. Not even once. Never! Only in this postmodern world of cowardly deceptive and evil-inteded politicians the opposite to this irrefutable principle is preached to the hopeful, but gullible, masses as if it was a historical "gospel." Reality is that diplomacy has worked just to maintain peace, never to establish it. It is only AFTER the aggressors have been completely pounded by a decisive, superlative and unrelentless military might, which has caused them to feel flatly defeated, utterly humiliated, terrified beyond all measure, and therefore willing to depose all hegemonic dreams of conquest and dominium, that diplomacy has been proven effective to sustain the political gains achieved through warfare. It is only then, after the instinct for collective survival arises in the majority of the bully population, during the agony of their defeat and their postwar desperation, that they become reacheable through the reasoning and logic of diplomacy.
We can see clear examples of the above stated historical axiom in the attitudinal changes that nation bullies like Germany and Japan experienced after their blatant, and highly costly, military defeat in WWII. These belligerent foes before are now not only friendly, but even close allies to their once hated enemies. In the same way we can observe the cases of Egypt and Jordan. These former sworn enemies of Israel are now at relative peace with the Jewish nation — they even practice some levels of cooperation with Israel. Such changes came as as a direct consequence of the unquestionable beating they suffered at the hands of Israel FIRST, and the effects of diplomatic work LATER ON. Diplomacy could never convince Nazi-lover Gamal Abdel Nasser that being at peace with Israel was a good idea. But his clear military defeat during the Seven Day War in 1967 cost him his presidential position in Egypt, and this oppened the door to a more moderate Anwar el Sadat. And Sadat knew by hard experience that playing with fire really burns. In the same way and at the same time Hussein, the king of Jordan, learned the same lesson. Again, by military means. Up to this day neither Egypt nor Jordan have any real love for Israel and her people; but out of fear, they learned to repect her.
Without a doubt, fear is the only true deterrent against war. After all, that is what truly prevented an atomic war between the USSR and America. Diplomacy without fear is worthless among foes. Diplomacy worked during the Missiles Crises in 1962 because Nikita Khrushev was really affraid of the American atomic weaponry which he knew that Kennedy was ready to use. The raw American military power convinced the evil Russian bully that it was not a good idea after all to pursue an atomic fortification in Cuba, so he changed his plans. In contrast to that, he was not affraid of Hungary in 1956, nor of Czechoslovakia in 1968, so he invaded them mercillesly. Diplomacy was of no use in either of these cases. Can Israel learn something from it? Can we?
Another example? Ok, take France and her napoleonic dreams of European conquest in the 19th century. Poor Napoleon and his idiotic French followers got such a huge beating at the hands of the Russians first, and by the English later, that the chobby emperor disappeared from the European scene for good. And observe how, as a direct consequence of her military deafeats, once bully France suddenly became a cowardly nation who allowed the Germans to roll over her land and women in the 20th century. The Napoleonic lesson was well learned indeed and, Marseillaise and all, both the French population and the French government were not willing to drink again another glass of the same sour wine of war they had drunk before. So they allowed the German rape of Paris. Yeap, and so on, and so forth.
As a consequence of their criminal arrogance all these once bully nations were militarily reduced to smitherings at the hands of their attacked enemies who, by the way, gave them no breaks but the opportunity to unconditionally surrender. The only notable exception was the wars of Israel with Egypt and Jordan. Like always, these were saved by the evil intervention of the UN, France and America. Although, the continual beatings they received from the IDF made the necessary possitive effect in them. So they went for peace and diplomatic negotiations.
It is beyond any reasonable doubt that the countless losses in destroyed national infraestructure, historical monuments, works of art, as well as the enormous economic collapse that followed the defeat of all these bully nations, on top of the countless losses of human lives, forced them all to decide changing their evil ways for the more secure ways of a diplomacy that would prevent the repetition of their disaster. It was precisely such a socio-military disaster what open wide the doors for a productive diplomatic work. In that way, all these bully nations when confronted with the most socially convincing argument in the world — the military one — decided to stop their bullish behavior and so become, at least, semi-civilized in their dealings with other nations. That is history, folks — pure and simple history — not the fabricated old ladies' tales which we constantly hear estated by deceitful politicians, liberal university professors and repeated by the corrupted professionsal media establishment ... oh, and of course, the crooked Security Council and the General Assembly of the United nations Against Israel.
Now, do you want to know an even more interesting example from where we should learn a capital lesson for our days? That example is Islam. Yes, Islam. That bully religion whose evil statement of faith — as clearly expressed in the satanically inspired Koran — demands the conquest of the whole world in order to force it into worshipping a demon, filthier than a pig, called Allah.
Bully Islam In History
Just like in these days when Hezbollah (a.k.a. Hizbully or Hizbullcrap) and all its Muslim sympathizers in the world celebrate a "victory" against Israel that mostly exists in their feverish minds, in the times of the Crusades Muslims celebrated pyrrhic "victories." They perceived as a "great" success to win battles and eventually a war against a relatively small bunch of Catholic rufians who were logistically disconnected from all their sources in their native Europe. Ah, the brave Mohammedan warriors were so emboldened by their victory by sheer numbers! But already before that Islam had been drastically defeated by Europeans when its advance in Europe was totally halted by a Catholic Frankish king, Charles Martel, in 732 C.E. The Mohammedans never dared another attempt against Europe on that side. Certainly, they held Spain under their control for several centuries but after many battles, in 1492 C.E., they found that Spain had turned into a too hot a pan to be holding it by the handle. So, they surrendered and fled Iberia for good. Islam had been again flatly humiliated by another clear defeat — and this defeat took a good part of the wind out of their dark sails.
Later on, in the 19th century, the European colonial powers militarily and economically put Islam to eat dust (or sand if you prefer). So the once arrogant Mohammedan warriors, so bent to mostly fight huge battles against smaller enemies, became the classic camel herders and thieves who would stab someone's back to rob him of a couple of dinars. (The tale that Muslims cannot steal is a total lie. They are allowed by Koran to steal, lie, rape and even assassinate non-Muslims. It is to other Muslims that they are not allowed to do so.)
During the first part of the 20th century Islam was totally submitted by England and France. The Muslim abjection was displayed for all the world to see. Like any personal or collective bully, Islam was proven to be just a coward when punched hard, and repeatedly, right on the nose and other tender areas. During that time when Muslims were "brave" was when they would attack the laborious and pacific Jewish settlers in the Holy Land, or in other areas of the Middle East like Iraq.
These lessons should not be forgotten. Bullies ALWAYS are gooing to interpret appeasement as cowardice, and the offering of an olive branche as a show of weakness. ALL bullies are cowards dressed in bravado clothings. Bullies ONLY understand violence as an effective means of deterrence and convincing.
Speaking To Be Understood
Why would Israel continue talking peace and conciliation to Muslims in a language they are evidently unable to understand?
If I speak to you in let's say Spanish or French you might not understand a word I say, no matter how ample my vocabulary is or how perfect my pronunciation and grammar might be. Why then can you not understand my very clear and proper Spanish? The answer to that mini-riddle is very simple, but also very profound: you do not understand it because you do not speak it. The fact is that you can only understand the language that you, yourself, can speak.
The evil pamphlet known as Koran as well as politically incorrect (meaning, true) world history, both, show that Islam can only speak the language of war or violence. Would Muslim then understand the language of peace and conciliation spoken by Israel? Surely not! So, let Israel speak to the Muslim world in the ONLY language they can obviously understand: war and violence. Let her speak it to them long and loud. And while screaming to them in that ugly language, let her force them to learn, once and for all, how to speak the language of peace. Maybe after a hard and sustained-to-its-proper-end lesson of peace spoken in the laguage of violence they might finally come to learn to speak peace. But if you finish the lesson before its required end, how can we expext dumb pupils to ever learn? Again, let not only Israel, but the entire civilized world, talk to Islam in the language that they ONLY understand. Talk to them loud, repeatedly, without any breaks — just as they would do to us if they had the chance. Yell to them in their own language until they decide that the sounds of your words are too hard to be heard. Then they will decide to learn another language for good. By the way, if they insanely resist to ever learn at all, then that would prove that it is time to entirely extirpate from this planet such repulsive religion of hatred. Failure to do so will be equivalent to a nuclear holocaust, sooner rather than later. Rabid Islamic Pakistan has already nuclear weapons, while Iran is on her way. And who knows whatever else is happening that we still do not know. When they feel secure in their perveived power they will not backe down like Krushev did. Their Muslim religious-suicidal propensity will pass from being expressed from the individual level to the collective one. By that time it will be too late and billions of truly innocent people will die without ever knowing why. So, in reality the hard choice is ours and now: in what language are we going to speak to Islam?
|
